uint32_t stored_crc = read_crc(block); uint32_t computed_crc = crc32(block_data); if (stored_crc != computed_crc) repair_block_from_replica();

If you want, I can produce a short implementation sketch (pseudo-code) for retry + read-after-write verification, or a logging schema for the detailed logs. Which would you prefer?

Are these errors occurring during a like backups or migrations? Share public link

When the disk block reports that the atomic test-and-set has returned false, it is not merely a technical error or a transient state. It is a profound philosophical statement about the nature of reality, time, and the impossibility of true sameness in a dynamic system.

: Used SCSI reservations to lock an entire LUN (Logical Unit Number), preventing other hosts from accessing it entirely during updates. ATS Method

Understanding "Atomic Test-and-Set of Disk Block Returned False for Equality"

Are you experiencing this error during a like a VM power-on, or is it happening randomly across the cluster? Performance issues with VM operations

ATS is a storage hardware acceleration feature (part of VAAI) used by ESXi to lock individual disk blocks rather than an entire LUN.

You may have computed the expected value incorrectly—for example, using a stale version number. Recompute the expected value by re-reading the block immediately before TAS, not relying on cached data more than a few milliseconds old.

grep -i "atomic test and set" /var/log/messages dmesg | grep -i "compare.*write\|reservation" journalctl -xe | grep "false for equality"

[Host VMkernel Log] ScsiDeviceIO: Cmd(0x45d90f0d4e48) 0x89 ... failed H:0x0 D:0x2 P:0x0 Valid sense data: 0xe 0x1d 0x0 DLX: try lock error: Atomic test and set of disk block returned false for equality

Many "false for equality" errors stem from firmware bugs in:

: Attempting to extend an "ATS-only" datastore with a non-ATS LUN, or issues with ATS Heartbeats on certain storage firmware. Troubleshooting & Resolution

Limit the maximum number of concurrent migrations permitted across the cluster network.

user wants a long article about the keyword "atomic test and set of disk block returned false for equality". This phrase appears to be a log message from a database or operating system, likely related to concurrency control, disk block management, or an atomic operation failure. I need to search for this exact phrase and related concepts. I'll break down the search into several categories: exact phrase search, database crash recovery, operating systems, file systems, concurrency control, and possibly specific open-source projects like PostgreSQL or SQLite. I'll also search for "test-and-set" instruction, "atomic" operations, and "disk block" management. search results for the exact phrase have returned some results. The most relevant ones are result 0 from 3parug.com and result 1 from communities.vmware.com. These appear to be forum posts about a VMware ESXi datastore error. The phrase "Atomic test and set of disk block returned false for equality" seems to be a log message from VMware's vmkernel. The search also returned a result about "ATS Miscompare revisited in vSphere 6.5" from cormachogan.com. I should open these pages to get more details. search results provide context for the error message. The user likely wants a comprehensive article explaining this error. I should also search for more technical details about ATS (Atomic Test and Set) in VMware, VAAI, and the SCSI COMPARE AND WRITE command. Additionally, I should look for information on how to troubleshoot this error. search results provide a lot of information. I will now open the most relevant results.

Another host in the cluster might have updated the block or taken the lock while the current host was waiting, leading to a "miscompare".

If a specific storage array struggles to handle ATS cleanly, you can temporarily or permanently disable hardware-assisted locking. For example, in VMware ESXi, you can modify the advanced system settings to turn off ATS and revert to traditional SCSI reservations: VMFS3.HardwareAcceleratedLocking = 0 Use code with caution.